diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index af46242..81d11e7 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ pairing with smart people at Hashrocket.
 
 For a steady stream of TILs, [sign up for my newsletter](https://crafty-builder-6996.ck.page/e169c61186).
 
-_1655 TILs and counting..._
+_1656 TILs and counting..._
 
 See some of the other learning resources I work on:
 - [Get Started with Vimium](https://egghead.io/courses/get-started-with-vimium~3t5f7)
@@ -1295,6 +1295,7 @@ If you've learned something here, support my efforts writing daily TILs by
 - [Assert About An Object's Attributes With RSpec](ruby/assert-about-an-objects-attributes-with-rspec.md)
 - [Assoc For Hashes](ruby/assoc-for-hashes.md)
 - [Audit Your Ruby Project For Any CVEs](ruby/audit-your-ruby-project-for-any-cves.md)
+- [Avoid Double Negation With Minitest Refute](ruby/avoid-double-negation-with-minitest-refute.md)
 - [Block Comments](ruby/block-comments.md)
 - [Block Syntaxes Have Different Precedence](ruby/block-syntaxes-have-different-precedence.md)
 - [Build HTTP And HTTPS URLs](ruby/build-http-and-https-urls.md)
diff --git a/ruby/avoid-double-negation-with-minitest-refute.md b/ruby/avoid-double-negation-with-minitest-refute.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e4a523f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/ruby/avoid-double-negation-with-minitest-refute.md
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+# Avoid Double Negation With Minitest Refute
+
+As I'm writing some tests for a recent feature, I end up with various test
+cases that make a variety of assertions.
+
+```ruby
+assert_equal resp_body["id"], expected_id
+
+# ...
+
+assert_not resp_body["items"].empty?
+```
+
+The first assertion reads pretty naturally. The second one requires some extra
+mental parsing because of the `_not` and then the "negative" check of
+`#empty?`.
+
+Another way to express this that might read more naturally is with
+[`#refute`](https://ruby-doc.org/stdlib-3.0.2/libdoc/minitest/rdoc/Minitest/Assertions.html#method-i-refute).
+
+```ruby
+refute resp_body["items"].empty?
+```
+
+This says that we _refute_ that items is empty, so the assertion should fail if
+empty.
+
+Ruby is flexible in other ways. We may also prefer to write it as:
+
+```ruby
+assert resp_body["items"].present?
+```
+
+Or we could even take advantage of a more specific variant of refute with
+[`#refute_empty`](https://ruby-doc.org/stdlib-3.0.2/libdoc/minitest/rdoc/Minitest/Assertions.html#method-i-refute_empty):
+
+```ruby
+refute_empty resp_body["items"]
+```