Add Make Structs Easier To Use With Keyword Initialization as a Ruby TIL

ruby/make-structs-easier-to-use-with-keyword-initialization.md

@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+# Make Structs Easier To Use With Keyword Initialization
+
+Typically a [`Struct`](https://ruby-doc.org/3.4.1/Struct.html#method-c-new) in
+Ruby is defined and initialized like so:
+
+```ruby
+> Subscriber = Struct.new(:email, :first_name, :status, :tags)
+=> Subscriber
+> s1 = Subscriber.new('bob.burgers@example.com', 'Bob', :active, [:food, :family])
+=> #<struct Subscriber email="bob.burgers@example.com", first_name="Bob", status=:active, tags=[:food, :family]>
+> s1.email
+=> "bob.burgers@example.com"
+```
+
+That's a nice way to structure light-weight objects.
+
+A potential challenge with multi-argument `Struct` definitions like this,
+especially when they aren't colocated with initialization, is that it can be
+hard to remember or distinguish the argument order when initializing an instance
+of one.
+
+Ruby 2.5 added the `keyword_init` option to help with this exact issue. When
+that option is set to `true` for a `Struct` definition, then we get to
+initialize it with keyword arguments rather than positional arguments.
+
+```ruby
+> Subscriber = Struct.new(:email, :first_name, :status, :tags, keyword_init: true)
+=> Subscriber(keyword_init: true)
+* s1 = Subscriber.new(
+*   first_name: 'Bob',
+*   email: 'bob.burgers@example.com',
+*   tags: [:food, :family],
+*   status: :active
+> )
+=> #<struct Subscriber email="bob.burgers@example.com", first_name="Bob", status=:active, tags=[:food, :family]>
+> s1.email
+=> "bob.burgers@example.com"
+```
+
+Notice I have to use keyword arguments now and that because of that I can
+organize them in whatever order makes sense. Coming back to view this line of
+code later, it is easy to see attribute each value corresponds to.
+
+[source](https://www.bigbinary.com/blog/ruby-2-5-allows-creating-structs-with-keyword-arguments)