1
0
mirror of https://github.com/jbranchaud/til synced 2026-01-03 07:08:01 +00:00

Add Disable And Enable A Button as a Tailwind TIL

This commit is contained in:
jbranchaud
2025-09-29 18:54:05 -05:00
parent 8613c21f41
commit e8b953ba6d
2 changed files with 74 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ pairing with smart people at Hashrocket.
For a steady stream of TILs, [sign up for my newsletter](https://crafty-builder-6996.ck.page/e169c61186). For a steady stream of TILs, [sign up for my newsletter](https://crafty-builder-6996.ck.page/e169c61186).
_1656 TILs and counting..._ _1657 TILs and counting..._
See some of the other learning resources I work on: See some of the other learning resources I work on:
- [Get Started with Vimium](https://egghead.io/courses/get-started-with-vimium~3t5f7) - [Get Started with Vimium](https://egghead.io/courses/get-started-with-vimium~3t5f7)
@@ -1470,6 +1470,7 @@ If you've learned something here, support my efforts writing daily TILs by
- [Apply Tailwind Classes To Existing CSS Class](tailwind/apply-tailwind-classes-to-existing-css-class.md) - [Apply Tailwind Classes To Existing CSS Class](tailwind/apply-tailwind-classes-to-existing-css-class.md)
- [Base Styles For Text Link](tailwind/base-styles-for-text-link.md) - [Base Styles For Text Link](tailwind/base-styles-for-text-link.md)
- [Disable And Enable A Button](tailwind/disable-and-enable-a-button.md)
- [Specify Paths For Purging Unused CSS](tailwind/specify-paths-for-purging-unused-css.md) - [Specify Paths For Purging Unused CSS](tailwind/specify-paths-for-purging-unused-css.md)
- [Use Tailwind Typography Prose In Dark Mode](tailwind/use-tailwind-typography-prose-in-dark-mode.md) - [Use Tailwind Typography Prose In Dark Mode](tailwind/use-tailwind-typography-prose-in-dark-mode.md)

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
# Disable And Enable A Button
With TailwindCSS we can take a couple different approaches to tie the visual
and functional interactivity of a button to another elements state using
classes.
One approach is to use
[`peer`](https://tailwindcss.com/docs/hover-focus-and-other-states#styling-based-on-sibling-state)
and `peer-checked:<class>`.
```html
<div>
<input
type="checkbox"
id="peer-enable"
class="w-5 h-5 cursor-pointer peer"
/>
<label
for="peer-enable"
class="cursor-pointer text-slate-700 font-medium"
>
I agree to the terms and conditions
</label>
<button
class="opacity-40 pointer-events-none grayscale cursor-not-allowed peer-checked:opacity-100 peer-checked:pointer-events-auto peer-checked:grayscale-0 peer-checked:cursor-pointer"
>
Peer Submit
</button>
</div>
```
Classes to make to button appear disabled (e.g. `opacity-40`) as well as
functional classes that affect interactivity (e.g. `pointer-events-none`) are
applied by default. When the sibling checkbox gets checked, the inverted
classes take effect making the button enabled.
The `peer` approach works, but lacks flexibility. As soon as I need to make any
structural changes to the HTML that sever the peer (i.e. sibling) relationship
of the checkbox and the button, those classes stop working.
With
[`group`](https://tailwindcss.com/docs/hover-focus-and-other-states#styling-based-on-the-descendants-of-a-group)
and `group-has-[:checked]:<class>`, I can style the button relative to another
group member as long as everything is nested under some shared group tag.
```html
<div class="group">
<div class="flex items-center gap-3">
<input
type="checkbox"
id="group-enable"
class="w-5 h-5 cursor-pointer"
/>
<label
for="group-enable"
class="cursor-pointer text-slate-700 font-medium"
>
I agree to the terms and conditions
</label>
</div>
<button
class="opacity-40 pointer-events-none grayscale cursor-not-allowed group-has-[:checked]:opacity-100 group-has-[:checked]:pointer-events-auto group-has-[:checked]:grayscale-0 group-has-[:checked]:cursor-pointer"
>
Group Submit
</button>
</div>
```
We can even utilize [named
groups](https://tailwindcss.com/docs/hover-focus-and-other-states#differentiating-nested-groups)
if we have overlapping and conflicting group interactions. But I won't get into
that here.