Merge 5615da920f into e0db60f6ce

README.md

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ pairing with smart people at Hashrocket.
 
 For a steady stream of TILs, [sign up for my newsletter](https://crafty-builder-6996.ck.page/e169c61186).
 
-_1520 TILs and counting..._
+_1519 TILs and counting..._
 
 ---
 
@@ -1188,7 +1188,6 @@ _1520 TILs and counting..._
 - [Audit Your Ruby Project For Any CVEs](ruby/audit-your-ruby-project-for-any-cves.md)
 - [Assoc For Hashes](ruby/assoc-for-hashes.md)
 - [Block Comments](ruby/block-comments.md)
-- [Block Syntaxes Have Different Precedence](ruby/block-syntaxes-have-different-precedence.md)
 - [Build HTTP And HTTPS URLs](ruby/build-http-and-https-urls.md)
 - [Chaining Multiple RSpec Change Matchers](ruby/chaining-multiple-rspec-change-matchers.md)
 - [Check For Any Overlaps In List Of Ranges](ruby/check-for-any-overlaps-in-list-of-ranges.md)

ruby/block-syntaxes-have-different-precedence.md

@@ -1,29 +0,0 @@
-# Block Syntaxes Have Different Precedence
-
-There are two syntaxes for defining a block in Ruby. The semantically shorthand
-syntax uses the curly braces (`{}`). The semantically multi-line syntax uses
-`do` and `end`. For nearly all intents and purposes they are interchangable.
-
-It is, however, worth noting that the `do`/`end` version has a lower precedence
-than the already low precedence of `{}`. That said, you have to write some
-weird code for this to become an issue.
-
-Let's say we have two methods, `method_one` and `method_two`. They are both
-called on the same line like below and then followed by a block argument. Which
-method receives the block argument?
-
-```ruby
-method_one method_two { |n|
-  puts "Executing a block: #{n}"
-}
-
-method_one method_two do |n|
-  puts "Executing a block: #{n}"
-end
-```
-
-In the first case, with the curly braces, `method_two` receives the block as an
-argument. In the second case, with the `do`/`end`, `method_one` receives the
-block as an argument.
-
-[source](http://localhost:3131/ruby-operators/curly-braces#block-shorthand)